
Teks -- Daniel 1:8 (NET)




Nama Orang, Nama Tempat, Topik/Tema Kamus



kecilkan semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Kata/Frasa (per frasa)
Wesley -> Dan 1:8
Wesley: Dan 1:8 - But Daniel purposed There may be several weighty reasons assigned why Daniel did this. Because many of those meats provided for the king's table, were forbidden by the Je...
There may be several weighty reasons assigned why Daniel did this. Because many of those meats provided for the king's table, were forbidden by the Jewish law. Daniel knew these delicates would too much gratify the flesh. He did not dare to eat and drink things consecrated to idols. He was sensible, how unsuitable delicate fare would be to the afflicted state of God's people. Therefore he was herein a rare pattern of avoiding all the occasions of evil.
JFB: Dan 1:8 - Daniel . . . would not defile himself with . . . king's meat Daniel is specified as being the leader in the "purpose" (the word implies a decided resolution) to abstain from defilement, thus manifesting a charac...
Daniel is specified as being the leader in the "purpose" (the word implies a decided resolution) to abstain from defilement, thus manifesting a character already formed for prophetical functions. The other three youths, no doubt, shared in his purpose. It was the custom to throw a small part of the viands and wine upon the earth, as an initiatory offering to the gods, so as to consecrate to them the whole entertainment (compare Deu 32:38). To have partaken of such a feast would have been to sanction idolatry, and was forbidden even after the legal distinction of clean and unclean meats was done away (1Co 8:7, 1Co 8:10; 1Co 10:27-28). Thus the faith of these youths was made instrumental in overruling the evil foretold against the Jews (Eze 4:13; Hos 9:3), to the glory of God. Daniel and his three friends, says AUBERLEN, stand out like an oasis in the desert. Like Moses, Daniel "chose rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season" (Heb 11:25; see Dan. 9:3-19). He who is to interpret divine revelations must not feed on the dainties, nor drink from the intoxicating cup, of this world. This made him as dear a name to his countrymen as Noah and Job, who also stood alone in their piety among a perverse generation (Eze 14:14; Eze 28:3).

JFB: Dan 1:8 - requested While decided in principle, we ought to seek our object by gentleness, rather than by an ostentatious testimony, which, under the plea of faithfulness...
While decided in principle, we ought to seek our object by gentleness, rather than by an ostentatious testimony, which, under the plea of faithfulness, courts opposition.
Clarke -> Dan 1:8
Clarke: Dan 1:8 - But Daniel - would not defile himself But Daniel - would not defile himself - I have spoken of this resolution in the introduction. The chief reasons why Daniel would not eat meat from t...
But Daniel - would not defile himself - I have spoken of this resolution in the introduction. The chief reasons why Daniel would not eat meat from the royal table were probably these three: -
1. Because they ate unclean beasts, which were forbidden by the Jewish law
2. Because they ate, as did the heathens in general, beasts which had been strangled, or not properly blooded
3. Because the animals that were eaten were first offered as victims to their gods. It is on this account that Athenaeus calls the beasts which here served up at the tables of the Persian kings,
Calvin -> Dan 1:8
Calvin: Dan 1:8 - NO PHRASE Here Daniel shows his endurance of what he could neither cast off nor escape; but meanwhile he took care that he did not depart from the fear of God,...
Here Daniel shows his endurance of what he could neither cast off nor escape; but meanwhile he took care that he did not depart from the fear of God, nor become a stranger to his race, but he always retains the remembrance of his origin, and remains a pure, and unspotted, and sincere worshipper of God. He says, therefore, — he determined in his heart not to pollute himself with the kings food and drink, and that he asked the prefect, under whose charge he was, that he should not be driven to this necessity. It may be asked here, what there was of such importance in the diet to cause Daniel to avoid it? This seems to be a kind of superstition, or at least Daniel may have been too morose in rejecting the king’s diet. We know that to the pure all things are pure, and this rule applies to all ages. We read nothing of this kind concerning Joseph, and very likely Daniel used all food promiscuously, since he was treated by the king with great honor. This, then, was not perpetual with Daniel; for he might seem an inconsiderate zealot, or this might be ascribed, as we have said, to too much moresoness. If Daniel only for a time rejected the royal food, it was a mark of levity and inconsistency afterwards to allow himself that liberty from which he had for the time abstained. But if he did this with judgment and reason, why did he not persist in his purpose? I answer, — Daniel abstained at first from the luxuries of the court to escape being tampered with. It was lawful for him and his companions to feed on any kind of diet, but he perceived the king’s intention. We know how far enticements prevail to deceive us; especially when we are treated daintily; and experience shows us how difficult it is to be moderate when all is affluence around us, for luxury follows immediately on plenty. Such conduct is, indeed, too common, and the virtue of abstinence is rarely exercised when there is an abundance of provisions.
But this is not the whole reason which weighed with Daniel. Sobriety and abstinence are not simply praised here, since many twist this passage to the praise of fasting, and say Daniel’s chief virtue consisted in preferring pulse to the delicacies of a palace. For Daniel not only wished to guard himself against the delicacies of the table, since he perceived a positive danger of being eaten up by such enticements; hence he simply determined in his hem not to taste the diet of the court, desiring by his very food perpetually to recall the remembrance of his country. He wished so to live in Chaldea, as to consider himself an exile and a captive, sprung from the sacred family of Abraham. We see, then, the intention of Daniel. He desired to refrain from too great an abundance and delicacy of diet, simply to escape those snares of Satan, by which he saw himself surrounded. He was, doubtless, conscious of his own infirmity, and this also is to be reckoned to his praise, since; through distrust of himself he desired to escape from all allurements and temptations. As far as concerned the king intention, this was really a snare of the devil, as I have said. Daniel rejected it, and there is no doubt that God enlightened his mind by his Spirit as soon as he prayed to him. Hence he was unwilling to cast himself into the snares of the devil, while he voluntarily abstained from the royal diet. This is; the full meaning; of the passage.
It may also be asked, Why does Daniel claim this praise, as His own, which was shared equally with his companions? for he was not the only one who rejected the royal diet. It is necessary to take notice, how from his childhood he was, governed by the Spirit of God, that the confidence and influence of his teaching might be the greater; hence he speaks peculiarly of himself, not for the sake of boasting, but to obtain confidence in his teaching, and to show himself to have been for a long period formed and polished by God for the prophetic office. We must also remember that he was the adviser of his companions; for this course might never have come into their minds, and they might have been corrupted, unless they had been admonished by Daniel. God, therefore, wished Daniel to be a leader and master to his companions, to induce them to adopt the same abstinence. Hence also we gather, that as each of us is endued more fruitfully with the grace of the Spirit, so should we feel bound to instruct others. It will not be sufficient for any one to restrain himself and thus to discharge his own duty, under the teaching of God’s Spirit, unless he also extend his hand to others, and endeavor to unite in an alliance of piety, and of the fear and worship of God. Such an example is here proposed to us in Daniel, who not only rejected the delicacies of the palace, by which he might be intoxicated and even poisoned; but he also advised and persuaded his companions to adopt the same course. This is the reason why he calls tasting the king’s food pollution or abomination, though, as I have said, there was nothing abominable in it of itself. Daniel was at liberty to eat and drink at the loyal table, but the abomination arose from the consequences. Before the time of these four persons living in Chaldea., they doubtless partook of ordinary food after the usual manner, and were permitted to eat whatever was offered to them. They did not ask for pulse when at an inn, or on their journey; but they began to desire it when the king wished to infect them with his delicacies, and to induce them if possible to prefer that condition to returning to their own friends. When they perceived the object of his snares, then it became both a pollution and abomination to feed on those dainties, and to eat, at the king’s table. Thus we may ascertain the reason why Daniel thought himself polluted if he fared sumptuously and partook of the royal diet; he was conscious, as we have already observed, of his own infirmities, and wished to take timely precautions, lest he should be enticed by such snares, and fall away from piety and the worship of God, and degenerate into the manners of the Chaldeans, as if he were one of their nation, and of their native princes. I must leave the rest till tomorrow.
Defender -> Dan 1:8
Defender: Dan 1:8 - defile himself The king's gourmet food would have been defiling to godly Jews in at least three ways: (1) it would have contained blood, contrary to Lev 17:10-14; (2...
The king's gourmet food would have been defiling to godly Jews in at least three ways: (1) it would have contained blood, contrary to Lev 17:10-14; (2) it would have included the meat of swine, forbidden in Lev 11:7, Lev 11:8; and, most seriously, (3) it would have been consecrated to the pagan gods of Babylon. Nevertheless, Daniel was gracious and respectful in making his request to be excused."
TSK -> Dan 1:8
TSK: Dan 1:8 - purposed // defile purposed : Rth 1:17, Rth 1:18; 1Ki 5:5; Psa 119:106, Psa 119:115; Act 11:23; 1Co 7:37; 2Co 9:7
defile : Heathen nations not only ate unclean beasts, w...
purposed : Rth 1:17, Rth 1:18; 1Ki 5:5; Psa 119:106, Psa 119:115; Act 11:23; 1Co 7:37; 2Co 9:7
defile : Heathen nations not only ate unclean beasts, which were forbidden by Jewish law, but even the clean animals that were eaten were first offered as victims to their gods, and part of the wine was poured out as a libation on their altars. Hence Atheneus calls the beasts served up at the tables of the Persian kings,

kecilkan semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Kata/Frasa (per Ayat)
Poole -> Dan 1:8
Poole: Dan 1:8 - purposed in his heart to abstain Ver. 8. There may be several weighty reasons assigned why Daniel did this.
1. Because many of those meats provided for the king’ s table were ...
Ver. 8. There may be several weighty reasons assigned why Daniel did this.
1. Because many of those meats provided for the king’ s table were such as were forbidden by the Jews’ law, whereof Daniel made conscience,
2. Daniel knew these delicacies would too much gratify and pamper the flesh, and therefore he would prevent the defilements which too often do arise from delicious fare, Deu 32:14,15 Eze 16:49 Hos 13:6 Rom 13:13 ; so that those who fare deliciously would practise this.
3. Daniel knew he should by this bait be taken with the hook which lay hid under it, and insensibly be drawn from the true to a false religion, by eating and drinking things consecrated to idols.
4. Daniel saw his people lie under God’ s displeasure by their captivity, and therefore could not but be sensible how unsuitable a courtly life would be in him to the afflicted state of God’ s people, Heb 11:24-26 . Therefore Daniel was herein a rare pattern of avoiding all the occasions of evil, which he did with purpose of heart, Act 11:23 ; saith the text, he
purposed in his heart to abstain
Haydock -> Dan 1:8
Haydock: Dan 1:8 - Daniel // Defiled Daniel, as head and nearer the throne, gave good example to the rest. (Worthington) ---
Defiled, either by eating meat forbidden by the law, or whi...
Daniel, as head and nearer the throne, gave good example to the rest. (Worthington) ---
Defiled, either by eating meat forbidden by the law, or which had before been offered to idols. (Challoner) ---
It was customary among the pagans to make an offering of some parts to their gods, or throw it into the fire. (Theodoret; Calmet) ---
These reasons determined the pious youths, (Haydock) who desired also to keep free from gluttony and other vices. (Theodoret) (Worthington)
Gill -> Dan 1:8
Gill: Dan 1:8 - But Daniel purposed in his heart // that he would not defile himself with the portion the king's meat // nor with the wine which he drank // therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself But Daniel purposed in his heart,.... It being proposed to him to be brought up in the manner before described, he revolved it in his mind; he well we...
But Daniel purposed in his heart,.... It being proposed to him to be brought up in the manner before described, he revolved it in his mind; he well weighed it, and considered it with himself, and came to a resolution about it. This is to be understood of him, not to the exclusion of his three companions, who were of the same mind with him, as appears by what follows; but perhaps it was first thought of by him; at least he first moved it to them, to which they consented; and because he was the principal in this affair, it is ascribed to him as his purpose and resolution:
that he would not defile himself with the portion the king's meat; by eating of it; partly because it might consist of what was forbidden by the law of Moses, as the flesh of unclean creatures, particularly swine, and fat and blood, and so defile himself in a ceremonial sense; and partly because, though it might be food in itself lawful to be eaten, yet part of it being first offered to their idol "Bel", as was usual, and the whole blessed in his name, it would have been against his conscience, and a defiling of that, to eat of things offered to, or blessed in the name of, an idol:
nor with the wine which he drank; which was as unlawful as his food; being a libation to his gods, as Aben Ezra observes; otherwise wine was not forbidden; nor was it disused by Daniel, when he could partake of it in his own way, Dan 10:3,
therefore he requested of the prince of the eunuchs that he might not defile himself; he did not, in a surly, still, and obstinate manner, refuse the meat and drink brought; but prudently made it a request, and modestly proposed it to the prince of the eunuchs, that had the care and charge of him and his companions; and who also joined with him in this humble suit, as appears by what follows.

buka semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Ayat / Catatan Kaki

buka semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Rentang Ayat
Maclaren -> Dan 1:8-21
Maclaren: Dan 1:8-21 - A Libation To Jehovah Youthful Confessors
But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king's meat...
MHCC -> Dan 1:8-16
MHCC: Dan 1:8-16 - --The interest we think we make for ourselves, we must acknowledge to be God's gift. Daniel was still firm to his religion. Whatever they called him,...
Matthew Henry -> Dan 1:8-16
Matthew Henry: Dan 1:8-16 - -- We observe here, very much to our satisfaction, I. That Daniel was a favourite with the prince of the eunuchs (...
Keil-Delitzsch -> Dan 1:8-16
Keil-Delitzsch: Dan 1:8-16 - --
The command of the king, that the young men should be fed with the food and wine from the king's table, was to Daniel and his friends a test of t...
Constable -> Dan 1:1-21; Dan 1:8-13
