kecilkan semua
Teks -- Romans 4:2 (NET)

Paralel
Ref. Silang (TSK)
ITL
Nama Orang, Nama Tempat, Topik/Tema Kamus



kecilkan semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Kata/Frasa (per frasa)
The Scripture (

Robertson: Rom 4:2 - Was justified by works Was justified by works ( ex ergōn edikaiōthē ).
Condition of first class, assumed as true for the sake of argument, though untrue in fact. The ...
Was justified by works (
Condition of first class, assumed as true for the sake of argument, though untrue in fact. The rabbis had a doctrine of the merits of Abraham who had a superfluity of credits to pass on to the Jews (Luk 3:8).

Robertson: Rom 4:2 - But not towards God But not towards God ( all' ou pros theon ).
Abraham deserved all the respect from men that came to him, but his relation to God was a different matte...
But not towards God (
Abraham deserved all the respect from men that came to him, but his relation to God was a different matter. He had there no ground of boasting at all.
Vincent: Rom 4:2 - For For
Supply , Abraham found nothing according to the flesh ; for , if he did, he has something to boast of.
For
Supply , Abraham found nothing according to the flesh ; for , if he did, he has something to boast of.

Vincent: Rom 4:2 - By works By works ( ἐξ ἔργων )
Lit., out of works. In speaking of the relation of works to justification, Paul never uses διά by o...
By works (
Lit., out of works. In speaking of the relation of works to justification, Paul never uses
Wesley -> Rom 4:2
Wesley: Rom 4:2 - -- The meaning is, If Abraham had been justified by works, he would have had room to glory. But he had not room to glory. Therefore he was not justified ...
The meaning is, If Abraham had been justified by works, he would have had room to glory. But he had not room to glory. Therefore he was not justified by works.
JFB: Rom 4:1-3 - What shall we say then that Abraham, our father as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? That is, (as the order in the original shows), "hath found, as pertaining to ('according to,' or 'through') the flesh"; meaning, "by all his natural e...
That is, (as the order in the original shows), "hath found, as pertaining to ('according to,' or 'through') the flesh"; meaning, "by all his natural efforts or legal obedience."

JFB: Rom 4:2 - For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God "If works were the ground of Abraham's justification, he would have matter for boasting; but as it is perfectly certain that he hath none in the sight...
"If works were the ground of Abraham's justification, he would have matter for boasting; but as it is perfectly certain that he hath none in the sight of God, it follows that Abraham could not have been justified by works." And to this agree the words of Scripture.
Clarke: Rom 4:2 - For if Abraham were justified by works For if Abraham were justified by works - The Jew proceeds: - I conclude, therefore, that Abraham was justified by works, or by his obedience to this...
For if Abraham were justified by works - The Jew proceeds: - I conclude, therefore, that Abraham was justified by works, or by his obedience to this law of circumcision; and, consequently, he has cause for glorying,

Clarke: Rom 4:2 - Apostle. But not before God Apostle. But not before God - These seem to be the apostle’ s words, and contain the beginning of his answer to the arguments of the Jew, as if...
Apostle. But not before God - These seem to be the apostle’ s words, and contain the beginning of his answer to the arguments of the Jew, as if he had said: - Allowing that Abraham might glory in being called from heathenish darkness into such marvellous light, and exult in the privileges which God had granted to him; yet this glorying was not before God as a reason why those privileges should be granted; the glorying itself being a consequence of these very privileges.
Calvin -> Rom 4:2
Calvin: Rom 4:2 - NO PHRASE 2.=== For if Abraham, === etc. This is an incomplete argument, 131 which may be made in this form — “If Abraham was justified by works, he might...
2.=== For if Abraham, === etc. This is an incomplete argument, 131 which may be made in this form — “If Abraham was justified by works, he might justly glory: but he had nothing for which he could glory before God; then he was not justified by works.” Thus the clause but not before God, is the minor proposition; and to this must be added the conclusion which I have stated, though it is not expressed by Paul. He calls that glorying when we pretend to have anything of our own to which a reward is supposed to be due at God’s tribunal. Since he takes this away from Abraham, who of us can claim for himself the least particle of merit?
Defender -> Rom 4:2
Defender: Rom 4:2 - justified by works The supposed contradiction between Paul and James has been widely noted. Paul says Abraham was not justified by works; James says he was (Jam 2:21). T...
The supposed contradiction between Paul and James has been widely noted. Paul says Abraham was not justified by works; James says he was (Jam 2:21). The point is that Abraham was justified by faith in God's Word, but he then was asked to demonstrate that his faith was genuine by his works. He was justified before God by faith but was justified before men by his works (Jam 2:21-24)."
TSK -> Rom 4:2
TSK: Rom 4:2 - Abraham // he hath // but Abraham : Rom 3:20-28; Phi 3:9
he hath : Rom 3:27, Rom 15:17; Eze 8:9; Jer 9:23, Jer 9:24; 1Co 9:16; 2Co 5:12, 2Co 11:12, 2Co 11:30; 2Co 12:1-9; Gal 6...

kecilkan semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Kata/Frasa (per Ayat)
Poole -> Rom 4:2
Poole: Rom 4:2 - He hath whereof to glory // But not before God He hath whereof to glory he hath cause or matter of glorying and boasting; he hath something from whence he may take occasion of so doing.
But not b...
He hath whereof to glory he hath cause or matter of glorying and boasting; he hath something from whence he may take occasion of so doing.
But not before God something must be supplied to fill up the sense, i.e. he hath nothing whereof to glory before God. The argument of the apostle might be thus formed: If Abraham had obtained justification by works, he should have had somewhat whereof he might glory before God: but he had nothing whereof to glory before God; therefore he was not justified by works. God’ s way of justifying sinners is such, as shuts out all glorying and boasting, as he had before laid down, Rom 3:27 .
Haydock -> Rom 4:2
Haydock: Rom 4:2 - If Abraham were justified by works // Not with God If Abraham were justified by works, or by his own works, he might have glory, and be commended by men, who judge only according to outward appear...
If Abraham were justified by works, or by his own works, he might have glory, and be commended by men, who judge only according to outward appearances; but not with God: that is, he could not be truly justified, so as to deserve a reward in heaven, without faith and the grace of God. (Witham) ---
Not with God. Whatever glory or applause such works might procure from men, they would be of no value in the sight of God. (Challoner)
Gill -> Rom 4:2
Gill: Rom 4:2 - For if Abraham were justified by works // he hath whereof to glory // but not before God For if Abraham were justified by works,.... That Abraham was not, and could not be justified by works, is clear from hence, that if this was his case,...
For if Abraham were justified by works,.... That Abraham was not, and could not be justified by works, is clear from hence, that if this was his case,
he hath whereof to glory; which will be allowed him before men, on account of his pious life and conversation:
but not before God; who saw all the iniquity of his heart, and was privy to all his failings and infirmities: besides, glorying before God in a man's own works, is contrary to the scheme and method of God's grace; is excluded by the doctrine of faith; nor is there any place for glorying before God but in Christ, and his righteousness: if therefore Abraham had not that of which he could glory before God, he could not be justified by works in his sight: but does not the Apostle James say that he was justified by works, Jam 2:21? To this it may be replied, that the two apostles, Paul and James, are not speaking of the same thing: Paul speaks of justification before God, James of justification before men; Paul speaks of the justification of the person, James of the justification of a man's cause, as the truth of his faith, or the uprightness of his conduct; Paul speaks of works, as the causes of justification, James of them as the effects and evidences of faith; Paul had to do with the self-righteous, who trusted in their own works for justification, James with Gnostics, who slighted and neglected the performance of them. These things considered, they will be found to agree.

buka semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Ayat / Catatan Kaki

buka semuaTafsiran/Catatan -- Catatan Rentang Ayat
MHCC -> Rom 4:1-12
MHCC: Rom 4:1-12 - --To meet the views of the Jews, the apostle first refers to the example of Abraham, in whom the Jews gloried as their most renowned forefather. Howe...
Matthew Henry -> Rom 4:1-8
Matthew Henry: Rom 4:1-8 - -- Here the apostle proves that Abraham was justified not by works, but by faith. Those that of all men contended most vigorously for a share in rig...
Barclay -> Rom 4:1-8
Barclay: Rom 4:1-8 - "THE FAITH WHICH TAKES GOD AT HIS WORD" Paul moves on to speak of Abraham for three reasons.
(i) The Jews regarded Abraham as the great founder of the race and the pattern of all t...
Constable: Rom 3:21--6:1 - --III. THE IMPUTATION OF GOD'S RIGHTEOUSNESS 3:21--5:21
In beginning t...





