TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Keluaran 6:12

Konteks
6:12 But Moses replied to 1  the Lord, “If the Israelites did not listen to me, then 2  how will Pharaoh listen to me, since 3  I speak with difficulty?” 4 

Keluaran 10:2

Konteks
10:2 and in order that in the hearing of your son and your grandson you may tell 5  how I made fools 6  of the Egyptians 7  and about 8  my signs that I displayed 9  among them, so that you may know 10  that I am the Lord.”

Seret untuk mengatur ukuranSeret untuk mengatur ukuran

[6:12]  1 tn Heb “And Moses spoke before.”

[6:12]  2 sn This analogy is an example of a qal wahomer comparison. It is an argument by inference from the light (qal) to the heavy (homer), from the simple to the more difficult. If the Israelites, who are Yahwists, would not listen to him, it is highly unlikely Pharaoh would.

[6:12]  3 tn The final clause begins with a disjunctive vav (ו), a vav on a nonverb form – here a pronoun. It introduces a circumstantial causal clause.

[6:12]  4 tn Heb “and [since] I am of uncircumcised lips.” The “lips” represent his speech (metonymy of cause). The term “uncircumcised” makes a comparison between his speech and that which Israel perceived as unacceptable, unprepared, foreign, and of no use to God. The heart is described this way when it is impervious to good impressions (Lev 26:41; Jer 9:26) and the ear when it hears imperfectly (Jer 6:10). Moses has here returned to his earlier claim – he does not speak well enough to be doing this.

[10:2]  5 tn The expression is unusual: תְּסַפֵּר בְּאָזְנֵי (tÿsapper bÿozne, “[that] you may declare in the ears of”). The clause explains an additional reason for God’s hardening the heart of Pharaoh, namely, so that the Israelites can tell their children of God’s great wonders. The expression is highly poetic and intense – like Ps 44:1, which says, “we have heard with our ears.” The emphasis would be on the clear teaching, orally, from one generation to another.

[10:2]  6 tn The verb הִתְעַלַּלְתִּי (hitallalti) is a bold anthropomorphism. The word means to occupy oneself at another’s expense, to toy with someone, which may be paraphrased with “mock.” The whole point is that God is shaming and disgracing Egypt, making them look foolish in their arrogance and stubbornness (W. C. Kaiser, Jr., “Exodus,” EBC 2:366-67). Some prefer to translate it as “I have dealt ruthlessly” with Egypt (see U. Cassuto, Exodus, 123).

[10:2]  7 tn Heb “of Egypt.” The place is put by metonymy for the inhabitants.

[10:2]  8 tn The word “about” is supplied to clarify this as another object of the verb “declare.”

[10:2]  9 tn Heb “put” or “placed.”

[10:2]  10 tn The form is the perfect tense with vav consecutive, וִידַעְתֶּם (vidatem, “and that you might know”). This provides another purpose for God’s dealings with Egypt in the way that he was doing. The form is equal to the imperfect tense with vav (ו) prefixed; it thus parallels the imperfect that began v. 2 – “that you might tell.”



TIP #12: Klik ikon untuk membuka halaman teks alkitab saja. [SEMUA]
dibuat dalam 0.03 detik
dipersembahkan oleh YLSA