Imamat 1:9
Konteks1:9 Finally, the one presenting the offering 1 must wash its entrails and its legs in water and the priest must offer all of it up in smoke on the altar 2 – it is 3 a burnt offering, a gift 4 of a soothing aroma to the Lord.
Imamat 16:22
Konteks16:22 The goat is to bear on itself all their iniquities into an inaccessible land, 5 so he is to send the goat away 6 in the wilderness.
Imamat 16:26
Konteks16:26 and the one who sent the goat away to Azazel 7 must wash his clothes, bathe his body in water, and afterward he may reenter the camp.
Imamat 21:12
Konteks21:12 He must not go out from the sanctuary and must not profane 8 the sanctuary of his God, because the dedication of the anointing oil of his God is on him. I am the Lord.
[1:9] 1 tn Heb “Finally, he”; the referent (the offerer) has been specified in the translation for clarity. Once again, the MT assigns the preparation of the offering (here the entrails and legs) to the offerer because it did not bring him into direct contact with the altar, but reserves the actual placing of the sacrifice on the altar for the officiating priest (cf. the notes on vv. 5a and 6a).
[1:9] 2 tn Heb “toward the altar,” but the so-called locative ה (hey) attached to the word for “altar” can indicate the place where something is or happens (GKC 250 §90.d and GKC 373-74 §118.g; cf. also J. Milgrom, Leviticus [AB], 1:161). This is a standard way of expressing “on/at the altar” with the verb “to offer up in smoke” (Hiphil of קָטַר [qatar]; cf. also Exod 29:13, 18, 25; Lev 1:9, 13, 15, 17; 2:2, etc.).
[1:9] 3 tc A few Hebrew
[1:9] 4 sn The standard English translation of “gift” (אִשֶּׁה, ’isheh) is “an offering [made] by fire” (cf. KJV, ASV). It is based on a supposed etymological relationship to the Hebrew word for “fire” (אֵשׁ, ’esh) and is still maintained in many versions (e.g., NIV, RSV, NRSV, NLT; B. A. Levine, Leviticus [JPSTC], 7-8). For various reasons, including the fact that some offerings referred to by this term are not burned on the altar (see, e.g., Lev 24:9), it is probably better to understand the term to mean “gift” (J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 22) or “food gift” (“food offering” in NEB and TEV; J. Milgrom, Leviticus [AB], 1:161-62). See R. E. Averbeck, NIDOTTE 1:540-49 for a complete discussion.
[16:22] 5 tn The Hebrew term rendered “inaccessible” derives from a root meaning “to cut off” (cf. NAB “an isolated region”). Another possible translation would be “infertile land” (see HALOT 187 s.v. *גָּזֵּר and cf. NRSV “a barren region”; NLT “a desolate land.”
[16:22] 6 tn Heb “and he [the man (standing) ready, v. 21] shall send the goat away.”
[16:26] 7 tn For “Azazel” see the note on v. 8 above.
[21:12] 8 sn Regarding “profane,” see the note on Lev 10:10 above.