Hebrews 7:11 
Konteks| NETBible |
|
| NASB © biblegateway Heb 7:11 |
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? |
| HCSB | If, then, perfection came through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise in the order of Melchizedek, and not to be described as being in the order of Aaron? |
| LEB | Thus if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for on the basis of it the people received the law, what further need [is there] for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek and not said to be according to the order of Aaron? |
| NIV © biblegateway Heb 7:11 |
If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the law was given to the people), why was there still need for another priest to come—one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? |
| ESV | Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron? |
| NRSV © bibleoremus Heb 7:11 |
Now if perfection had been attainable through the levitical priesthood—for the people received the law under this priesthood—what further need would there have been to speak of another priest arising according to the order of Melchizedek, rather than one according to the order of Aaron? |
| REB | Now if perfection had been attainable through the levitical priesthood (on the basis of which the people were given the law), there would have been no need for another kind of priest to arise, described as being in the order of Melchizedek, instead of in the order of Aaron. |
| NKJV © biblegateway Heb 7:11 |
Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? |
| KJV | If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
[+] Bhs. Inggris
|
|
| KJV | therefore <3767> perfection <5050> by <1223> the Levitical <3020> priesthood <2420>_, (for <1063> under <1909> it <846> the people <2992> what <5101> further <2089> need <5532> [was there] that another <2087> priest <2409> after <2596> the order <5010> of Melchisedec <3198>_, and <2532> not <3756> after <2596> the order <5010> of Aaron <2>_? |
| NASB © biblegateway Heb 7:11 |
Now <3767> if <1487> perfection <5050> was through <1223> the Levitical <3020> priesthood <2420> (for on the basis <1909> of it the people <2992> received <3549> the Law <3549> ), what <5101> further <2089> need <5532> was there for another <2087> priest <2409> to arise <450> according <2596> to the order <5010> of Melchizedek <3198> , and not be designated <3004> according <2596> to the order <5010> of Aaron <2> ? |
| NET [draft] ITL | So <3767> if <1487> perfection <5050> had in fact been possible through <1223> the Levitical <3020> priesthood <2420> – for <1063> on <1909> that basis <846> the people <2992> received the law <3549> – what <5101> further <2089> need <5532> would there have been for another <2087> priest <2409> to arise <450> , said <3004> to be in <2596> the order <5010> of Melchizedek <3198> and <2532> not <3756> in <2596> Aaron’s <2> order <5010> ? |
| GREEK | |
| NETBible |
|
| NET Notes |
1 tn Grk “based on it.” |
