Imamat 22:19-25

22:19 if it is to be acceptable for your benefit ¹  it must be a flawless male from the cattle, sheep, or goats. 22:20 You must not present anything that has a flaw, ²  because it will not be acceptable for your benefit. ³  22:21 If a man presents a peace offering sacrifice to the Lord for a special votive offering ⁴  or for a freewill offering from the herd or the flock, it must be flawless to be acceptable; ⁵  it must have no flaw. ⁶ 

22:22 “‘You must not present to the Lord something blind, or with a broken bone, or mutilated, or with a running sore, ⁷  or with a festering eruption, or with a feverish rash. ⁸  You must not give any of these as a gift ⁹  on the altar to the Lord. 22:23 As for an ox ¹⁰  or a sheep with a limb too long or stunted, ¹¹  you may present it as a freewill offering, but it will not be acceptable for a votive offering. ¹²  22:24 You must not present to the Lord something with testicles that are bruised, crushed, torn, or cut off; ¹³  you must not do this in your land. 22:25 Even from a foreigner ¹⁴  you must not present the food of your God from such animals as these, for they are ruined and flawed; ¹⁵  they will not be acceptable for your benefit.’”

Ulangan 17:1

17:1 You must not sacrifice to him ¹⁶  a bull or sheep that has a blemish or any other defect, because that is considered offensive ¹⁷  to the Lord your God.

Maleakhi 1:8

1:8 For when you offer blind animals as a sacrifice, is that not wrong? And when you offer the lame and sick, ¹⁸  is that not wrong as well? Indeed, try offering them ¹⁹  to your governor! Will he be pleased with you ²⁰  or show you favor?” asks the Lord who rules over all.

Maleakhi 1:13

1:13 You also say, ‘How tiresome it is.’ You turn up your nose at it,” says the Lord who rules over all, “and instead bring what is stolen, lame, or sick. You bring these things for an offering! Should I accept this from you?” ²¹  asks the Lord.

[22:19]  ¹ tn Heb “for your acceptance.” See Lev 1:3-4 above and the notes there.

[22:20]  ² tn Heb “all which in it [is] a flaw.” Note that the same term is used for physical flaws of people in Lev 21:17-24. Cf. KJV, ASV, NRSV “blemish”; NASB, NIV, TEV “defect”; NLT “with physical defects.”

[22:20]  ³ tn Heb “not for acceptance shall it be for you”; NIV “it will not be accepted on your behalf” (NRSV and NLT both similar).

[22:21]  ⁴ tn The meaning of the expression לְפַלֵּא־נֶדֶר (lÿfalle’-neder) rendered here “for a special votive offering” is much debated. Some take it as an expression for fulfilling a vow, “to fulfill a vow” (e.g., HALOT 927-28 s.v. פלא piel and NASB; cf. NAB, NRSV “in fulfillment of a vow”) or, alternatively, “to make a vow” or “for making a vow” (HALOT 928 s.v. פלא piel [II פלא]). Perhaps it refers to the making a special vow, from the verb פָלַא (pala’, “to be wonderful, to be remarkable”); cf. J. Milgrom, Numbers (JPSTC), 44. B. A. Levine, Leviticus (JPSTC), 151 and 193, suggests that this is a special term for “setting aside a votive offering” (related to פָלָה [palah, “to set aside”]). In general, the point of the expression seems to be that this sacrifice arises as a special gift to God out of special circumstances in the life of the worshiper.

[22:21]  ⁵ tn Heb “for acceptance”; NAB “if it is to find acceptance.”

[22:21]  ⁶ tn Heb “all/any flaw shall not be in it.”

[22:22]  ⁷ tn Or perhaps “a wart” (cf. NIV; HALOT 383 s.v. יַבֶּלֶת, but see the remarks in J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 358).

[22:22]  ⁸ sn See the note on Lev 21:20 above.

[22:22]  ⁹ sn This term for offering “gift” is explained in the note on Lev 1:9.

[22:23]  ¹⁰ tn Heb “And an ox.”

[22:23]  ¹¹ tn Heb “and stunted” (see HALOT 1102 s.v. I קלט).

[22:23]  ¹² sn The freewill offering was voluntary, so the regulations regarding it were more relaxed. Once a vow was made, the paying of it was not voluntary (see B. A. Levine, Leviticus [JPSTC], 151-52, for very helpful remarks on this verse).

[22:24]  ¹³ sn Compare Lev 21:20b.

[22:25]  ¹⁴ tn Heb “And from the hand of a son of a foreigner.”

[22:25]  ¹⁵ tn Heb “for their being ruined [is] in them, flaw is in them”; NRSV “are mutilated, with a blemish in them”; NIV “are deformed and have defects.” The MT term מָשְׁחָתָם (moshkhatam, “their being ruined”) is a Muqtal form (= Hophal participle) from שָׁחַת (shakhat, “to ruin”). Smr has plural בהם משׁחתים (“deformities in them”; cf. the LXX translation). The Qumran Leviticus scroll (11QpaleoLev) has תימ הם[…], in which case the restored participle would appear to be the same as Smr, but there is no בְּ (bet) preposition before the pronoun, yielding “they are deformed” (see D. N. Freedman and K. A. Mathews, The Paleo-Hebrew Leviticus Scroll, 41 and the remarks in J. E. Hartley, Leviticus [WBC], 358).

[17:1]  ¹⁶ tn Heb “to the Lord your God.” See note on “he” in 16:1.

[17:1]  ¹⁷ tn The Hebrew word תּוֹעֵבָה (to’evah, “an abomination”; cf. NAB) describes persons, things, or practices offensive to ritual or moral order. See M. Grisanti, NIDOTTE 4:314-18; see also the note on the word “abhorrent” in Deut 7:25.

[1:8]  ¹⁸ sn Offerings of animals that were lame or sick were strictly forbidden by the Mosaic law (see Deut 15:21).

[1:8]  ¹⁹ tn Heb “it” (so NAB, NASB). Contemporary English more naturally uses a plural pronoun to agree with “the lame and sick” in the previous question (cf. NIV, NCV).

[1:8]  ²⁰ tc The LXX and Vulgate read “with it” (which in Hebrew would be הֲיִרְצֵהוּ, hayirtsehu, a reading followed by NAB) rather than “with you” of the MT (הֲיִרְצְךָ, hayirtsÿkha). The MT (followed here by most English versions) is to be preferred because of the parallel with the following phrase פָנֶיךָ (fanekha, “receive you,” which the present translation renders as “show you favor”).

[1:13]  ²¹ tn Heb “from your hand,” a metonymy of part (the hand) for whole (the person).